2008 Motion for Order to Show Cause

Docket Status

On June 18, 2013, Defend Oʻahu Coalition filed a Renewed Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why the Boundary Reclassification Should not be Revoked for Failure to Perform Conditions, Representations and Commitments. A readable/downloadable file can be found below under the Defend Oʻahu Coalition filings link.

The LUC, at its hearing on November 8, 2013, deferred action on the Renewed Motion for Order to Show Cause until after the legislative session of 2014.

Petitioner Filings City & County of Honolulu Filings State Office of Planning & Sustainable Development (OPSD) Filings Defend Oahu Coalition Filings Notice & Orders Public Comments

Respondent Turtle Bay Resort Company, LLC’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defend Oahu Coalition’s Renewed Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why the Boundary Reclassification Should Not Be Revoked for Failure to Perform Conditions, Representations and Commitments Filed Herein on June 18, 2013, Affidavit of Scott McCormack and COS

City and County of Honolulu Statement of Position

OP’s Response to Defend Oahu Coalition’s Renewed Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why the Boundary Classification Should Not Be Revoked for Failure to Perform Conditions, Representations and Commitments

Defend Oahu Coalition’s Renewed Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why the Boundary reclassification Should Not be Revoked for Failure to Perform Conditions, Representations and Commitments, Declaration of Timothy Vandeveer Exhibits “A” and “B”. COS filed 6/18/13 (pdf)

Defend Oahu Coalition’s Amended Certificate of Service re Defend Oahu Coalition’s Renewed Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why the Boundary Reclassification Should Not be Revoked for Failure to Perform Conditions, Representations and Commitments, filed June 18, 2013. (pdf)

Defend Oahu Coalition’s Reply Memorandum in Support of Renewed Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why the Boundary reclassification Should Not be Revoked for Failure to Perform Conditions, Representations and Commitments, COS

On March 27, 1986, the LUC approved the Petition subject to nine conditions.

A85-595 Kuilima Development Co. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order dated March 27, 1986

On March 15, 1989, the LUC approved a motion to amend the original Decision and Order by amending Condition 8 regarding the construction and operation of a sewage treatment facility.

Order to Amend Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order dated March 15, 1989

E-mail Comments Received as of January 01, 2013 (Part I)

E-mail Comments Received as of January 2, 2013 (Part II)

E-mail Comments Received as of January 15, 2013

E-mail Comments Received as of January 18, 2013

E-mail Comments Received as of January 23, 2013

E-mail Comments Received as of January 29, 2013

E-mail Comments Received as of February 04, 2013

E-mail Comments Received as of February 05, 2013

E-mail Comments Received as of February 11, 2013

E-mail Comments Received as of February 13, 2013

E-mail Comments Received as of March 07, 2013